You are here


    In re McCormick, 2006 WL 3499226 (December 2006) -- Chief Judge S.V. Kelley
    Till applies to 910 claims, and interest needs to be paid on such claims. In this case, given the very low risk of default, no additional interest was required to be added to the prime rate.

    In re Grunert, 353 B.R. 591 (November 2006) -- Chief Judge S.V. Kelley
    Above-median debtors could take Local Standard expense deduction for vehicle ownership/lease expense, even though they owned their vehicle free and clear of liens.

    In re Turkowitch, 355 B.R. 120 (November 2006) -- Chief Judge S.V. Kelley
    Surrender of collateral in complete satisfaction of 910-car creditor's claim is permitted by hanging paragraph of § 1325(a).

    In re FV Steel & Wire, 349 B.R. 181 (September 2006) -- Chief Judge S.V. Kelley
    Judicial estoppel does not apply to block claim of debtor who had inadvertently neglected to schedule claim and who cured the omission as soon as she learned of it. Also, Trustee had succeeded to claim and was not judicially estopped by debtor's omission.

    In re Guzman, 345 B.R. 640 (July 2006) -- Chief Judge S.V. Kelley
    Under BAPCPA § 1325(b)(3), reasonably necessary expenses to be deducted to determine disposable income of above-median debtors are based on Form B22C, not Schedule J.

    Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co. v. Addison (In re Addison), 05-2583 (unpublished) (July 2006) -- Chief Judge S.V. Kelley
    Debtor borrowed vehicle without permission and damaged the vehicle. Resulting debt to insurance company was dischargeable under § 523(a)(6).

    In re Kirchen, 344 B.R. 908 (July 2006) -- Chief Judge S.V. Kelley
    Inherited IRA is not exempt as a retirement benefit under Wis. Stat. § 815.18(3)(j).

    In re Estrada, No. 03-33013-svk (unpublished) (June 2006) -- Chief Judge S.V. Kelley
    In a pre-BAPCPA case, after secured vehicle was totally destroyed in an accident, secured creditor's recovery of insurance proceeds was limited to the amount of the allowed secured claim (net of payments received under the plan) as determined by Debtor's confirmed chapter 13 plan. Plan provided that property did not revest in debtor at confirmation; accordingly excess proceeds had to be paid to the Trustee.

    In re Racette, 343 B.R. 200 (May 2006) -- Chief Judge S.V. Kelley
    Debtors' request to strike petition that was filed without Section 109(h) credit briefing certificate was denied. Instead, case was dismissed, and counted as a case for purposes of Section 362(c)(3).

    In re Xiong, No 05-43121-svk (May 2006) -- Chief Judge S.V. Kelley
    Property that debtor owned with non-filing spouse when they moved to Wisconsin was not marital property, and non-filing spouse's interest was not property of the estate. As to property that did constitute marital property, debtor was entitled to exempt the full amount of the equity (up to the value of the federal exemptions) not just one-half.