Search Opinions
Judge Keywords
Total: 117

In re Ryan, 517 B.R. 905

(September 2014) -- Judge Kelley

In fee allowance dispute, Chapter 13 debtor's attorney bears burden of proving benefit of services to debtor, and in case that does not reach confirmation, the burden may be difficult to meet.  Also, the disclosure requirements of § 329 and Rule 2016(b) are mandatory and strictly enforced. 

Wan Ho Indus. Co., Ltd. v. Hemken (In re Hemken), 513 B.R. 344

(July 2014) -- Judge Kelley

Creditors' complaints for discharge and dischargeability denied because creditors did not carry their burden of proving that debtor acted with requisite fraudulent intent.

In re Moncree, 511 B.R. 922

(June 2014) -- Judge Kelley

Debtor not permitted to amend confirmed plan to reduce value of property and thereby reduce amount of secured creditor's claim.

In re Ingram, 508 B.R. 98

(March 2014) -- Judge Kelley

Attorneys' fees and punitive damages for stay violation denied when towing company held valid statutory lien on debtor's truck.


In re Ingram, 2014 Bankr. LEXIS 1217

(March 2014) -- Judge Kelley

Debtor's attorney forced to refund entire fee when she gave inappropriate advice to file bankruptcy when a state court action was warranted, filed inaccurate schedules and fee disclosure and failed to appear at a hearing on enforcement of the stay taking the position that her fee did not cover that hearing.


State of Wisconsin-Department of Workforce Development v. Davis (In re Davis), 507 B.R. 280

(March 2014) -- Judge Kelley

The Debtor was not personally liable under Wis. Stat. § 108.22(9) for a defunct corporation's liability for unpaid unemployment contributions.

In re Rove, 505 B.R. 502

(October 2013) -- Judge Kelley

Debtor was allowed to exempt interest in Dairy Cooperative equity account under § 522(d)(10)(E) because account was payable on account of age and was similar to a profit-sharing plan.

In re Gerard, 495 B.R. 850

(August 2013) -- Judge Kelley

Although the absolute priority rule continues to apply to individual chapter 11 debtors, debtor does not violate the rule by retaining exempt property.

In re McMahon Family L.P., 495 B.R. 411

(July 2013) -- Judge Kelley

Debtor's tree farm operation probably did not qualify for Chapter 12, and Debtor's plan was not feasible.


In re Noll, 491 B.R. 550

(May 2013) -- Judge Kelley

When Clerk issues notice of second claims bar date in reconverted case, creditor could file claim in reliance on that notice.  

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 2 of 12